Artikel

Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 /PUU-VIII / 2010 on Judical Review Act No. 1 of 1974 in The Concept Laqith and Wasiat Wajibah

---

Penilaian

---

Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 raises the pro and contra in the society, the side of the pro considers the Constitutional Court decision is justice for women who are victims of fraud or wedding sirri, also to the children born from this relationship. For contra, the decision of the Constitutional Court has strayed far from Islamic law, even considered legalizing adultery. In this research, writer used a qualitative approach, writer decipher Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 and then analyze them using concepts laqith and wasiat wajibah, laqith researchers use to justify their obligations towards their children’s biological father was borrowed and used as solutions to problems of inheritance of children outside of marriage. So, the writer concluded that based on these two concepts, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 does not conflict with Islamic law.

---

Ketersediaan

Sma 20170397

J 201.6 Sma

Perpustakaan A. Yani

Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - No Loan

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri

-

No. Panggil

J 201.6 Sma

Penerbit

Semarang : Balitbang Agama Semarang., 2016

Deskripsi Fisik

ii ,10 hlm, 24 cm

Bahasa

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

2528553X

Klasifikasi

201.6

Tipe Isi

-

Tipe Media

-

Tipe Pembawa

-

Edisi

Smart, Vol 2, No 1 Juli 2016

Subjek

Constitutional Court Decision No.46/PUU-VIII/2010

Info Detail Spesifik

-

Pernyataan Tanggungjawab

Kepala Balitbang Agama Semarang

Versi lain/terkait

Lampiran Berkas

Komentar

---

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar